511 SE 5th AVENUE


Do Parents’ Timing Attitudes Apply at Children’s Time Perceptions?

Analyses with thinking and you can expectations just like the created variables lack obvious temporary buying as the most of the ideational points were measured likewise in the baseline. Parental thinking basically occur before kid’s thinking and you may, when you find yourself there could be specific determine regarding children’s perceptions toward adult thinking, the bulk of new intergenerational impacts about the perceptions primarily jobs out of parents so you can children (Thornton ainsi que al. 2008). Then, prior research indicates you to definitely perceptions influence traditional, rather than requirement influencing attitudes (Fishbein and you can Ajzen 2010). It is useful, but not, to store the potential of reciprocal causation anywhere between perceptions away from mothers and kids at heart while we interpret overall performance, additionally the chances of opposite causation where expectations influence thinking.


Very first, we tested hypothesis 1 because of the exploring in the event that kid’s relationship timing attitudes be like its parents’ thinking (Arrow step 1, Fig. 1 ). Coefficients out-of linear regression models of children’s finest ages in the matrimony receive for the Dining table step three . Whenever mothers and fathers value old years within relationships, their children try more attending value more mature years, nevertheless the perception dimensions are more compact. For each a lot more seasons from better age offered by a mother or father and father are associated with the a growth from 0.05 and you may 0.07 many years, respectively, in children’s most useful years (Models step one and you may 2). These types of positive coefficients getting mothers’ and fathers’ finest years in addition to are nevertheless an identical or is actually some reduced when the two variables was within the same formula (Model step three). As the part estimate having fathers’ most readily useful many years (0.07) was quite bigger than that of mothers’ (0.05), that it difference in the latest coefficients isn’t mathematically significant.

Desk step three

Coefficients and you will sturdy standard problems away from typical the very least squares regressions from kid’s greatest years during the matrimony (attitudes) (n = 1562)

* p step one ) and you will theory step 3 one to parents’ time attitudes personally determine children’s requirement, net off child’s individual thinking (Arrow step three, Fig. step one ). This new purchased logistic regression models of kid’s expectation from how in the future they will certainly wed is placed in Dining table cuatro . Habits 1–4 measure time perceptions as the ideal decades from the marriage, if you are Patterns 5–8 scale time thinking because of the evaluating children’s standard age with the listing of acceptable decades.

Desk 4

Children’s and you can mothers’ finest age performed connect with children’s traditional. As expected, when people and their parents appreciated older better ages, students was basically significantly less gonna anticipate to wed soon. Especially, the chances ratios to possess better ages at relationships try 0.80 for the kids (Model step one) and 0.93 to possess parents (Design 2) (Desk cuatro ). In comparison, chances ratio to own dad’s most useful chronilogical age of 0.97 is virtually you to rather than statistically tall (Design step 3, Dining table cuatro ). This type of effects are independent; on the complete design along with about three family members’ finest many years, the odds rates keep nearly regular (Design 4, Dining table 4 ).

The purpose rates suggest child’s very own finest age has the best affect its standard, while you are mother’s best age is actually shorter influential and fathers’ greatest many years have a small dictate or none anyway. Adjusted Wald examination demonstrate that chances ratios into the children’s most useful many years differ significantly on the potential percentages for both mom’s and you can dad’s most useful decades. But not, the results from mothers’ and you may fathers’ ideal years to your kid’s criterion don’t differ notably.

When measuring time thinking by the contrasting kid’s age into acceptable wedding age brackets for a person of its intercourse, there can be next proof you to definitely youngsters and you may mothers are both important, but in various methods. Whenever kid’s ages try than the their unique timing thinking, an obvious “too quickly” feeling exists. If it is over 5 years “too-soon,” youngsters has actually from the one to-half the odds off hoping to wed in the future versus whenever it’s step three–five years “too-soon” (Patterns 5 and you can 8). The point prices of 1.31 (Model 5) and you can 1.35 (Model 8) recommend that when it is this new “right time” children keeps deeper probability of hoping to wed soon compared to the when it is step three–5 years “too quickly,” but these consequences aren’t statistically high. The purpose estimate for the kids below the new appropriate assortment, in the step one–2 yrs “too quickly,” ways they are somewhat likely to expect to wed in the near future that have part rates of 1.17 (Model 5) and you will step one.13 (Design 8), however these outcomes also are maybe not statistically extreme.